<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Prometheus Fusion Perfection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com</link>
	<description>Developing Clean, Cheap, Open Source Energy with the Bussard Reactor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vacuum Check by Remy Dyer</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2012/02/11/vacuum-check-2/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remy Dyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3188#comment-2686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another couple of thoughts about sealing, 

These guys reckon Glyptal is good, so long as you bake it.
http://www.coultersmithing.com/OldStuff/piranigage.html
 
Also, that metal gasket really just needs to be soft metal without any pores. Could try moulding your own out of solder?

I&#039;m not certain that solder would be all that good - may have too much dissolved gasses in it, but it&#039;s certainly soft, cheap, and reusable as well.

Best of luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another couple of thoughts about sealing, </p>
<p>These guys reckon Glyptal is good, so long as you bake it.<br />
<a href="http://www.coultersmithing.com/OldStuff/piranigage.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.coultersmithing.com/OldStuff/piranigage.html</a></p>
<p>Also, that metal gasket really just needs to be soft metal without any pores. Could try moulding your own out of solder?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not certain that solder would be all that good &#8211; may have too much dissolved gasses in it, but it&#8217;s certainly soft, cheap, and reusable as well.</p>
<p>Best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vacuum Check by Remy Dyer</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2012/02/11/vacuum-check-2/#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remy Dyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3188#comment-2685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, another thought about why the e-gun isn&#039;t working. When you broke it out of it&#039;s envelope, you would have removed the high tension positive &quot;attraction ring&quot;, which is formed by the metal coating about the tube.

This metal coating acts as an electrode to attract the electrons towards it&#039;s centre, and as it&#039;s wrapped around the tube, they fly through the middle.

The vacuum chamber won&#039;t work in this manner - as it forms a faraday cage when seen from the inside. If the cathode is at large negative volts with respect to the vacuum chamber, the electrons will just take the shortest path directly to it, not forming a beam at all. 

Point is, to throw the beam across the chamber, you&#039;ll need  a ring shape in front of the gun, at a high positive voltage with respect to both the gun and the vacuum chamber, in order to attract the electrons towards it.

You don&#039;t necessarily need much voltage between the focussing ring and the cathode - it&#039;s really intended just to change the width of the beam, acting as an electrostatic lens - hence it will need to be negative.

You also don&#039;t necessarily need much negative voltage on the gun itself - probably enough to overcome the work function of the cathode surface.

When you run a CRT externally, you can get away with wiring the gun to high negative, and the ht connection around the screen to ground, and it&#039;ll work, because the screen is still the closest &quot;positive&quot; to the gun. But in the vacuum chamber this won&#039;t work until the gun is pointed at the nearest wall of the chamber.

As always, best of luck, mate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, another thought about why the e-gun isn&#8217;t working. When you broke it out of it&#8217;s envelope, you would have removed the high tension positive &#8220;attraction ring&#8221;, which is formed by the metal coating about the tube.</p>
<p>This metal coating acts as an electrode to attract the electrons towards it&#8217;s centre, and as it&#8217;s wrapped around the tube, they fly through the middle.</p>
<p>The vacuum chamber won&#8217;t work in this manner &#8211; as it forms a faraday cage when seen from the inside. If the cathode is at large negative volts with respect to the vacuum chamber, the electrons will just take the shortest path directly to it, not forming a beam at all. </p>
<p>Point is, to throw the beam across the chamber, you&#8217;ll need  a ring shape in front of the gun, at a high positive voltage with respect to both the gun and the vacuum chamber, in order to attract the electrons towards it.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t necessarily need much voltage between the focussing ring and the cathode &#8211; it&#8217;s really intended just to change the width of the beam, acting as an electrostatic lens &#8211; hence it will need to be negative.</p>
<p>You also don&#8217;t necessarily need much negative voltage on the gun itself &#8211; probably enough to overcome the work function of the cathode surface.</p>
<p>When you run a CRT externally, you can get away with wiring the gun to high negative, and the ht connection around the screen to ground, and it&#8217;ll work, because the screen is still the closest &#8220;positive&#8221; to the gun. But in the vacuum chamber this won&#8217;t work until the gun is pointed at the nearest wall of the chamber.</p>
<p>As always, best of luck, mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vacuum Check by Remy Dyer</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2012/02/11/vacuum-check-2/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remy Dyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3188#comment-2684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conflats use a copper gasket - technically you&#039;re supposed to use both a required torque as well as replace the gaskets every time the flange is reinstalled.

(this is very expensive)

The sealing method basically depends on the copper deforming as the edge cuts into it, creating a seal that&#039;s basically perfect. This is also used in some very high pressure seals.

I suggest use of a torque wrench, and some experiments to determine how much torque you need to get good vacuum on the first, second ... n times that gasket is used.

You&#039;ll probably find you need to do it up a little tighter each time, as the copper deforms and exposes more surface area for the edge to contact.

At least this way you&#039;ll be able to get the maximum reuses out of your copper gaskets.

I&#039;d also be tempted to try with Al-foil or Al-sheet gaskets as well - it&#039;s sometimes used in place of copper (which has been in use for this kind of deforming seal for a very long time).

Might be worthwhile making up a set of dies to cut your own gaskets - it&#039;ll allow you to make your own gaskets and not pay the &quot;research tax&quot; these lab parts otherwise seem to attract.

Best of luck]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conflats use a copper gasket &#8211; technically you&#8217;re supposed to use both a required torque as well as replace the gaskets every time the flange is reinstalled.</p>
<p>(this is very expensive)</p>
<p>The sealing method basically depends on the copper deforming as the edge cuts into it, creating a seal that&#8217;s basically perfect. This is also used in some very high pressure seals.</p>
<p>I suggest use of a torque wrench, and some experiments to determine how much torque you need to get good vacuum on the first, second &#8230; n times that gasket is used.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll probably find you need to do it up a little tighter each time, as the copper deforms and exposes more surface area for the edge to contact.</p>
<p>At least this way you&#8217;ll be able to get the maximum reuses out of your copper gaskets.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be tempted to try with Al-foil or Al-sheet gaskets as well &#8211; it&#8217;s sometimes used in place of copper (which has been in use for this kind of deforming seal for a very long time).</p>
<p>Might be worthwhile making up a set of dies to cut your own gaskets &#8211; it&#8217;ll allow you to make your own gaskets and not pay the &#8220;research tax&#8221; these lab parts otherwise seem to attract.</p>
<p>Best of luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vacuum Check by theorbtwo</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2012/02/11/vacuum-check-2/#comment-2678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theorbtwo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3188#comment-2678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Possibly you should get a torque wrench, so you can reliably tighten the bolts to a known torque?  That does give you another variable to find the correct value for, as were, but it will at least move it from the &quot;unknown unknown&quot; to the &quot;known unknown&quot; category.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly you should get a torque wrench, so you can reliably tighten the bolts to a known torque?  That does give you another variable to find the correct value for, as were, but it will at least move it from the &#8220;unknown unknown&#8221; to the &#8220;known unknown&#8221; category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vacuum Check by Chris</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2012/02/11/vacuum-check-2/#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3188#comment-2676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep on trying though man, we are all pulling for you!  And yeah, thanks for the long awaited update lol, can&#039;t tell ya how many times I&#039;ve stopped by and gone &quot;Awww man...&quot;  *sadface* lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep on trying though man, we are all pulling for you!  And yeah, thanks for the long awaited update lol, can&#8217;t tell ya how many times I&#8217;ve stopped by and gone &#8220;Awww man&#8230;&#8221;  *sadface* lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vacuum Check by Christopher Hotchkiss</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2012/02/11/vacuum-check-2/#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hotchkiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3188#comment-2672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad you&#039;re able to post updates on this again, however your photo link doesn&#039;t seemto be working.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re able to post updates on this again, however your photo link doesn&#8217;t seemto be working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vacuum Check by Glenn</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2012/02/11/vacuum-check-2/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3188#comment-2671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good stuff. Thanks for the update!

Might be useful to loosen up one of those nuts and use the stethoscope to listen for the related leak when you know roughly where it should be, just to practice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. Thanks for the update!</p>
<p>Might be useful to loosen up one of those nuts and use the stethoscope to listen for the related leak when you know roughly where it should be, just to practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disappointment by Vacuum Check &#171; Prometheus Fusion Perfection</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2011/12/13/disappointment/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vacuum Check &#171; Prometheus Fusion Perfection]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3176#comment-2667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have Swiss TV journalist Yves Gerber with me in the lab today. I wanted to try the electron gun again while he was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have Swiss TV journalist Yves Gerber with me in the lab today. I wanted to try the electron gun again while he was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disappointment by olivier</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2011/12/13/disappointment/#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olivier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3176#comment-2651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,
Your pressure is too high, you need to be at the very least in the 1e-2 millitorr and really 1e-4 would be better. Your electrons are scattered and absorbed before the reach the screen (assuming they are emitted straight enough...).
Your vacuum vessel looks decent and you are using copper gaskets, good. what sort of pump do you have (turbopump would be my choice)?  I m not too kean on the wiring of your gun: regular plastics degas like mad (your fluo screen support might also be a problem...), plus you get a large amount of gas trapped inside the wire which will degas forever. Try using bare copper wire, keep them appart with ceramic or glassfiber insulation. Look up instrumentation for UHV surface science, like e-beam heater and ion guns, you should get some ideas. But basically if you want to go UHV (which you need for e-beam) you want to use only metal, ceramics or glass, possibly kapton. 
Good luck with your project ! I hope you succeed!
O.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Your pressure is too high, you need to be at the very least in the 1e-2 millitorr and really 1e-4 would be better. Your electrons are scattered and absorbed before the reach the screen (assuming they are emitted straight enough&#8230;).<br />
Your vacuum vessel looks decent and you are using copper gaskets, good. what sort of pump do you have (turbopump would be my choice)?  I m not too kean on the wiring of your gun: regular plastics degas like mad (your fluo screen support might also be a problem&#8230;), plus you get a large amount of gas trapped inside the wire which will degas forever. Try using bare copper wire, keep them appart with ceramic or glassfiber insulation. Look up instrumentation for UHV surface science, like e-beam heater and ion guns, you should get some ideas. But basically if you want to go UHV (which you need for e-beam) you want to use only metal, ceramics or glass, possibly kapton.<br />
Good luck with your project ! I hope you succeed!<br />
O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PROTEST National Defense Authorization Act by iRobot Robots</title>
		<link>http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/2011/12/15/protest-national-defense-authorization-act/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iRobot Robots]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prometheusfusionperfection.com/?p=3178#comment-2644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyed browsing your site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed browsing your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

