Yes, but conventional explosives trigger the fission, and so on. Just saying I don’t think it’s a good idea to have a double standard. Fusion has been used as a weapon too can’t avoid it.
1. No. Fission bombs are not triggered by conventional explosives.
2. It’s not a double standard to be for fusion power and against the hydrogen bomb.
3. Nothing you have said is a valid criticism of fusion power.
RT @AdamSerwer: If you prosecute reporters for seeking/receiving leaks and you're basically making non-government sanctioned reporting a cr… 11 hours ago
RT @MikeDrucker: REUTERS REPORTER 1: "Did you hear the AP fell victim to a hack?" REUTERS REPORTER 2: "You mean more than usual?" (They hig… 3 weeks ago
I enjoyed your talk at Lift12!
Thanks for posting the link.
The most powerful nuclear weapons also use fusion.
That’s True. However fusion weapons are trigger with a fission explosion first. Without the fission there is no weapon.
Yes, but conventional explosives trigger the fission, and so on. Just saying I don’t think it’s a good idea to have a double standard. Fusion has been used as a weapon too can’t avoid it.
1. No. Fission bombs are not triggered by conventional explosives.
2. It’s not a double standard to be for fusion power and against the hydrogen bomb.
3. Nothing you have said is a valid criticism of fusion power.